Skip to content
ALL DOCUMENTS ARE RESEARCH DRAFTS · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
AI Infrastructure That Humanity Can Govern
STORE Research Inc. · Democratic AI Frontier Research Lab

Public Peer Review

STORE Research publishes constitutional mathematics research for independent scholarly and policy review. The central claim: a database-layer enforcement of the one-third governance ceiling makes single-actor takeover a type error, not a policy violation. 2 granted US patents (US 11,080,691 B1 - US 12,165,142 B2) - 36 granted claims. 150+ families in pre-filing and pre-prosecution. Four formal papers in preparation. No invitation required to examine or critique. Submissions go to a moderated queue - nothing posts publicly without editorial review.

33.3%
Hamilton's Ceiling
67
Constitutional Surplus Threshold

01Constitutional MathematicsFour papers

The formal backbone - Papers 5, 3, 6, 7. In preparation. The source from which both experiments emerge.

Open questions - shared across all papers
  1. Schema-alteration / privilege threat model - formal treatment in preparation.
  2. Objective-rewriting resistance - AI agents that rewrite their own objectives remain the largest open question.
Paper 5: Constitutional Concentration Ceilings at the Schema Layer
Equilibrium Properties of the 1/3 Invariant
In Preparation · P0 · NBER working paper formatResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
In PreparationRead more
AudienceGame theory · Mechanism design · Distributed systems

Defines the normal-form game induced by CCE schema constraints. Proves the only Nash equilibria under max(Pc) < 1/3 are constitutionally compliant. First-play result via write-layer impossibility. Meta-game treatment: schema-alteration as nested two-stage game.

Paper 3: Extending Ostrom
Constitutional Market Governance at Internet Scale
In Preparation · White space confirmed G-1Research Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
In PreparationRead more
AudienceInstitutional economics · Governance journals · NBER

Closes Ostrom's three open problems simultaneously: large-scale governance, non-rivalrous digital commons, market-compatible constitutional governance. 'Constitutional Market Governance' = zero prior academic usage.

Paper 6: The Hamilton-Lamport Numerical Convergence
Independent derivation of the same threshold
In Preparation · Short formal noteResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
In PreparationRead more
AudienceHistory of mathematics · Philosophy of science

Hamilton (1787) and Lamport (1982) derived the same numerical threshold - 1/3 - without citing each other, across constitutional design and distributed computing. Zero cross-citation. 206 years apart.

Paper 7: Folk Theorem Departure in Multi-Agent AI Governance
First-play Nash via write-layer physical impossibility
In Preparation · Companion to Paper 5Research Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
In PreparationRead more
AudienceAI safety · Multi-agent systems

The Folk Theorem achieves Nash equilibrium via actor-held threats requiring repeated play. CCE achieves it at first play via write-layer impossibility: the violating state never becomes recorded history. Substrate-specificity is the non-obvious contribution.

02STORE CloudThree documents

AI and compute governance application - how the theorem runs at machine scale.

Physics of Trust for Computing
v2 · August 6, 2026
Open for examinationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
Research DraftRead more
AudienceIEEE/ACM · Distributed systems · AI governance

Hamilton's Law + Madison's Distribution + Ostrom's Architecture enforced simultaneously at the database write layer. AET-0 - the Controlled Collision Engine - is the first continuous write-time enforcement of the known BFT bound.

Publication link pending
Democratic AI
v4 · August 6, 2026
Open for examinationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
Research DraftRead more
AudienceAI safety · Multi-agent systems · AI governance

f = AI votes · n ≥ 3f + 1 human floor · HAMILTON → WINSTON → FERMI deployment order. No AI swarm can exceed one-third of governance weight - the schema won't let the write happen.

Publication link pending
STORE Cloud Scoreboard - Living Evidence
v6 · August 6, 2026
Live instrument · Pre-production scale · Open for examinationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
Living evidenceRead more
AudienceAll reviewers - living proof the governance mechanism works

126 governors · 0.8% max concentration · zero violations · three voluntary price cuts (-49%, -9%, -11%) when extraction was available. Nash equilibrium demonstrated in real governance data.

Publication link pending

03Trusted America - ResearchThree papers

Constitutional mathematics applied to American economic governance - the academic papers.

Physics of Trust for America
v2 · August 6, 2026
Open for examinationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
Research DraftRead more
AudiencePolicy journals · Institutional economics · Governance researchers

Two-layer Hamilton's Ceiling: local employer concentration (Layer A, county/HIZ) and national network gravity (Layer B, federal center capture). Routing not redistribution. Constitutional Surplus fires at Civic Score 67. HIZ activates at Civic Score 51.

Publication link pending
Constitutional Thermodynamics
v3 · August 6, 2026
Open for examinationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
Research DraftRead more
AudienceConstitutional political economy · Heterodox economics

A new field: the direction of economic energy by constitutional formula rather than political discretion. Parent: Buchanan's Constitutional Political Economy (Nobel 1986). Valve clarification: we install a constitutional valve - not a perpetual motion machine.

Publication link pending
Paper 8: The Constitutionalization Gap
In Preparation · Awaiting Grok Paper 8 research return
In PreparationResearch Draft · Pre-peer-review · Not for citation without permission
In PreparationRead more
AudiencePolitical economists · Welfare economists · Legal scholars

No major democracy has constitutionalized a national surplus-distribution formula. ADA is the first design that removes the distribution decision from political discretion. FDR wanted this in 1935 and could not achieve it.

04Trusted America - Protocols7 layers · 22 protocols

Policy review - the 7-layer, 17-protocol mechanism architecture. Does this work? Is it constitutional? Is it feasible?

This is policy review - not academic peer review. The question here is: does this mechanism work? Is it constitutional? Is it feasible for communities, Congress, and courts? 7 layers · 17+ protocols. All are drafts open for review.

Policy review

Trusted America protocol submissions differ from academic peer review. Policy reviewers include legal scholars, economists, constitutional lawyers, and community practitioners. All protocols are proposals only - no enabling legislation has been enacted.

Layer 1 - Foundation

3 protocols
  • Hamilton's Protocol
    ADA · Constitutional Surplus formula · Civic Score triggers (51/67/75)
    Policy Review Open
  • ADA - American Dream Accounts
    Annual constitutional dividend · fires at Civic Score 67 · HIZ activates at 51
    Policy Review Open
  • ADA Treasury Bond Protocol
    Sovereign bond mechanism for ADA funding
    Draft

Layer 2 - Trade + Security

3 protocols
  • Franklin Protocol
    Allied Treasury demand · yield compression · Barnes Elementary
    Policy Review Open
  • Trusted Chips + Minerals
    Supply chain sovereignty · CHIPS+ · Hamilton's 33% rule
    Draft
  • Trusted Energy
    American Energy Force · nuclear + clean · energy independence
    Draft

Layer 3 - Economic Activation

3 protocols
  • HIZ - Hometown Innovation Zones
    13-35% progressive rate · 70%/21% baseline · two-chest HIF
    Policy Review Open
  • Trusted Housing
    Constitutional housing investment architecture
    Draft
  • Trusted Capital
    Constitutional capital routing framework
    Draft

Layer 4 - Distribution

2 protocols
  • ADA Mechanisms
    IRS/Treasury delivery rail · annual at federal tax deadline
    Draft
  • ADA Independent Oversight Board
    Constitutional audit of distribution
    Proposed

Layer 5 - People

5 protocols
  • Trusted Immigration
    Earn your place · constitutional pathway
    Draft
  • Trusted AI + Trusted AI Wages
    AI governance in labor markets
    Draft
  • Trusted Worker Rights
    Constitutional labor floor
    Draft
  • Washington Doctrine v2.2
    Constitutional war powers · 4-tier framework
    Policy Review Open
  • Trusted Identity
    Constitutional identity architecture
    Draft

Layer 6 - Health

1 protocol
  • Trusted Health Outcomes / EHTC
    State health innovation architecture · 2.5% THIF mechanism
    Draft

Layer 7 - Proposed

5 protocols
  • Trusted Agriculture
    Constitutional farming architecture
    Proposed
  • Trusted Veterans
    Constitutional veterans care mandate
    Proposed
  • Trusted Education
    EETC · CTE · Teacher Excellence · Pre-K
    Draft
  • Trusted Defense / Trusted Compute
    CHIPS+ · constitutional bonding
    Draft
  • Trusted Families
    American Birthright · Pre-K · SS Choice
    Draft

Submit a reviewor get notified

Submissions go to a private moderated queue at team@storecloud.org. Nothing posts publicly without editorial review.

We'll notify you when new papers are available for review and when existing papers are updated. Research notification only - no commercial communications.

Show structured review prompts
  • Optional prompts - address any that are relevant
  • What mathematical claim do you find strongest, and what evidence would strengthen it?
  • Where does the threshold derivation need more formal proof?
  • What prior art in distributed systems, constitutional law, or mechanism design is missing from the citations?
  • Is the schema-privilege caveat sufficient? What additional limitations should be stated?
  • Does the Nash equilibrium claim hold under the assumptions stated?
  • What would a rigorous empirical test of these claims require?

Stays disabled until Turnstile returns a token - the backend rejects a submission without one.

Submissions go to a private moderated queue. Nothing posts publicly without editorial review. By submitting this form, you consent to STORE using your email and submission to respond, and to internal STORE staff having access to it through our administrative tools. See our Privacy Policy.

You're on the list. We'll notify you when new papers are available for review.

Submissions go to a private moderated queue. Nothing posts publicly without editorial review.

Public Peer-Review Preview. All documents and protocols are research drafts released solely for independent scholarly and policy examination. Not final publications. Not solicitations. All claims remain subject to external validation.

"Hamilton inspired (1787). Lamport proved (1982). McCoy connected (2017). Same threshold. First implementation."

storecloud.org/publicreview · STORE Research Inc. · August 2026